Stuck in the Same Family Arguments? Here’s What Might Be Going On Beneath The Surface

Date

Every family has its own dynamics, its own patterns and, at times, its own moments of feeling stuck. While the details may differ, one experience that’s almost universal is finding yourself having the same argument over and over again, despite your best intentions to move on.

It might be about homework, screen time, a teenager’s attitude, a towel left on the bathroom floor or a phone that wasn’t put away at the agreed time. On the surface, the issue can seem straightforward, but when the same conflict keeps resurfacing, it’s often a sign that something deeper is happening.

So rather than asking, “How do we stop having this argument?” a more useful question might be: what is happening underneath it, and why has this particular issue become so emotionally charged? 

In this blog, we’ll unpack what keeps families returning to the same conflicts, what’s often happening beneath the surface of these arguments, and how small shifts in understanding can help interrupt the cycle and strengthen family connections.

Families Are Systems, Not Collections of Individuals

One of the most helpful ways of understanding family conflict is to first think of the family as a whole system.

We often use the analogy of the mobile above a baby’s cot. You wind it up and the little teddy bears dance around evenly in a circle. But if one or more of the teddy bears goes out of line, the whole mobile is affected and the equilibrium changes. Eventually, when you try to wind it up again, you hear that little juddering noise. Families are usually very much like that.

When a family reflects on conflict, it’s easy to arrive at the belief that one person is the problem. In family therapy, it can be quite common for one or more members of a family to say, “We wouldn’t be here if it wasn’t for them.” But that way of looking at things can miss something important, which is that everyone in a family affects everyone else to some degree.

The beginning of the work is therefore to move the problem away from being located in one or two individuals and instead begin to understand what is happening across the family system. This doesn’t mean ignoring individual responsibility, or pretending that difficult behaviour doesn’t matter. But it does mean becoming curious about the relationships around the behaviour, and about what each person’s actions are doing to the rest of the system.

Why A Towel Left On The Floor Is Rarely About A Towel

Let’s take the towel left on the bathroom floor as our working example. Sometimes the frustration that comes from a towel being left on the floor really is simply because a towel has been left on the floor – it’s wet, it’s in the way, and it’s another task we have to do. It’s important to understand that not everything needs to be pathologised.

But when a family’s caught in a repetitive loop of conflict, the towel offers a doorway into something else. Everyone in the room may appear to be talking about the towel, but they may actually be referring to something much bigger going on.

For one parent, the towel might represent, “Why am I the only one holding this family together?” For another, it might represent feeling criticised or that nothing they do is ever good enough. And for a young person, it might be experienced as yet another demand or another sign that they are not being listened to.

The content of the conversation appears to be the same, but the process underneath it can be very different.

The same thing can happen with screen time. A young person stays up too late on their phone. Mum says they didn’t turn it off at the agreed time. The young person hides the phone. That reinforces secrecy, which reinforces Mum’s belief that they aren’t telling the truth. Mum asks more questions and pushes harder, and the young person retreats further. And the circle continues. 

The Emotional Cycle Underneath The Argument

People will respond in different ways when they’re under relational threat. One person may move closer and ask more questions, seek reassurance, want to know what is happening and try to pull everyone back together. On the surface this can look like digging, questioning or controlling – but underneath it may be an attempt to restore connection and safety.

Another person may withdraw. They might become quieter, retreat into themselves or avoid the conversation because they feel that nothing they do is good enough.

The more one person leans in, the more the other may retreat. The more the other retreats, the more the first person may feel they have to work harder to bring them back. This is the dance of the teddy bear mobile again. And children can become part of that dance too. 

One parent may appear to be the more demanding one while the other becomes the easier option. A child may move towards the parent who feels less activated, which can then activate the other parent further and lead them to think: “They’re not doing anything, so I’m alone in this. I have to work harder.”

Everyone’s response makes sense in the context of what they are experiencing, but together those responses can keep the cycle going.

What Happens When The Safety Of The Unit Is Shaken?

Before we can change these patterns, we need to consider whether there is safety within the family unit.

Volatility, repeated arguments and outbursts – whether they are firecrackers or bombs – can really rock the safety of a family system. When families get stuck, they are often trying to find safety themselves. They are trying to understand what is happening and find some kind of safe position within it.

But conflict can erode the very sense of safety that is needed to work through and resolve difficulties. This is why trying to force a family into a new way of communicating doesn’t always work. A new skill requires the opportunity to practise it. People need enough safety and stability to be receptive to trying something different. What can look like resistance to change is sometimes a lack of safety.

How Attachment Helps Us Understand The Pattern

Applying attachment theories can be useful here, but they need to be used carefully. It can be tempting to say, “One parent is anxious and the other is avoidant,” and then treat that as the explanation. But attachment is not a fixed position, and labelling people in this way can bring the curiosity to an end.

It’s more helpful to use attachment theory as a launchpad to ask better questions:

What happens to each person in the family when the relationship feels threatened?

Do they move closer, or further away?

Are they asking, “Are you listening to me?” or “What do I have to do to be seen and heard in this family?” Perhaps there is a fear that a door is going to close in the relationship.

It’s also important to recognise that a parent who’s questioning their child – “Where are you going? What are you doing? Can I see your phone?” – may be proximity-seeking. It may not be a very comfortable way for the other person to experience it, but underneath it can be an attempt to pull people closer and reassure themselves that the relationship is still there.

So the theory here is useful when it helps us remain curious, but it’s less useful when we use it to put a full stop on our understanding of someone.

Look For The Pattern, Not Just The Subject

One of the first small moves a family can make is to become curious about what happens when the argument starts:

  • Why has this subject become emotionally charged?
  • Why now?
  • Does it always follow the same pattern? 
  • Who usually says sorry – why do they say sorry? 
  • How does the family get out of the argument? 
  • What happens afterwards – how does everyone return to normal?
  • And, what does normal actually mean for this family?

These questions help us move from the surface-level content towards the process underneath it – what is it here that’s being enacted and re-enacted. That’s often where the more important information lies.

If we circle back to our working examples, we can see that the towel on the floor may be a doorway into the architecture of the family, the screen-time argument may be a doorway into questions about trust, connection, responsibility or feeling alone, and the homework battle may be carrying a much bigger anxiety about whether a child is going to be okay.

In understanding this, the step here isn’t for a parent to charge into the room saying, “Right, we all need to talk about this towel  because clearly it means more to you than that.” Instead, it can be beneficial to wonder: what does this represent for each person? Sometimes the conversations that emerge from that question should remain between the parents, rather than spill into the whole family unit, because there may well be something unspoken in the parental relationship that isn’t appropriate for everyone else to carry.

There Is No Such Thing As A Perfect Family

There is also an important piece here about tolerating distress. There is no such thing as a perfect family; an argument doesn’t automatically mean we have failed as parents, it doesn’t mean everything is going to escalate, it doesn’t mean that we have got everything terribly wrong.

A really beneficial point for families to learn is that two things can be held at once: this is difficult, and we can find a way through it. Understanding that can lead to a significant shift in how families approach conflict. Even moving the system a little can create a different possibility, from feeling completely stuck, to being open to try something new. Once there is more safety within the family, we can begin to invite the possibility of doing something differently.

From here we can begin to notice what happens to us when we sense that things are not okay. What happens to you as a mother? What happens to you as a father? What happens to you as a young person?

From Feeling Stuck To Being Open To Change

This is the opposite of resistance to change, and you may see small, positive actions start to happen. It might be as simple as slowing down before responding, noticing that the familiar argument is starting, asking a different question, taking the conversation out of the heat of the moment, or recognising that what feels like an argument about a wet towel on the floor or too much screentime, may be carrying something else.

Like any new skill, these positive steps take practice. Families need the opportunity to try something new without expecting themselves to get it right immediately. The aim isn’t to create a family that never argues because that isn’t realistic, and it isn’t necessary. All families have speed bumps, and some have much bigger things to deal with than others.

What matters is becoming able to recognise when you are caught in a familiar emotional loop, and to become curious enough about it to find another way through. Because, very often, the argument on the surface is only the beginning of the conversation. And sometimes, if we are able to look underneath it with enough safety, compassion and curiosity, that argument can become an invitation to understand the family differently.

The Wave: Inspiring and Inclusive Mental Health Support for Young People

The Wave offers specialist mental health support for young people and families. We combine exceptional clinical care with enriching experiences, education and social responsibility, supporting young people to grow in self-confidence and develop the skills they need to follow their dreams.

We prioritise fairness and inclusivity, adapting our programs to meet the needs of neurodiverse young people, emphasise each individual’s strengths and celebrate difference.

If you’re interested in finding out more about our programs, get in touch with us today. We’re here to help.

Fiona Yassin, Msc is the founder and clinical director at The Wave Clinic. She is a U.K. and International registered Psychotherapist and Accredited Clinical Supervisor (U.K. and UNCG).

More from Fiona Yassin

Professional associations and memberships

We are here to help

Have any questions or want to get started with the admissions process? Fill in the form below and we’ll get back to you as soon as possible.

    Wave-Logo_square

    Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Dubai, United Arab Emirates

    London, United Kingdom